No need to wonder what the Program Committee is looking for in a strong proposal!
Topics
The Program Committee wants to see:
- Hot topics that appeal across multiple ASPET division areas or related disciplines.
- Sessions that represent excellence in science, promote cross-disciplinary and translational research, and are of value to our divisions.
- Content that has a broad approach incorporating multiple areas of pharmacology and how it is connected.
- Ideas that showcase ASPET as a place of innovation and the home of pharmacology.
- Sessions of interest to educators.
- Sessions that represent a diversity of voices.
- Career development sessions.
- Sessions appealing to a variety of careers in science.
The number of sessions approved will be limited. We discourage proposals on topics too similar to ones presented at recent scientific meetings.
Format
Based on feedback from the pharmacology community, in addition to showcasing innovative science and education, participants place value on information delivered through interactive, innovative and
hands-on experiences that encourage exploration. It marries the novel and cutting-edge science with a format that is participatory.
The Program Committee will be specifically looking to program some non-traditional session formats that educate, inform and energize participants and will also look for interactive elements within traditional format sessions.
Our member research showed that participants prefer shorter format content. ASPET will have both 60-minute and 90-minute sessions. We encourage you not to cram too many invited speakers into one session, especially if
it is at the expense of short-changing Q&A with speakers or eliminating an abstract-based speaker in the session.
We anticipate using the Call for Session Proposals to program 12 sessions that are 60 minutes each and 14 sessions that are 90 minutes each.
Chair(s)
- At least one session chair must be an ASPET member.
- Co-chairs should be from different companies/institutions as each other.
- Only one chair is required. Sessions should have no more than two chairs.
Speakers
The Program Committee prefers:
- Speakers who represent a diversity of voices.
- No more than one speaker from the same company/institution. (Chairs can be speakers and that won’t count as the same institution.)
- Speakers who have not participated at an ASPET Annual Meeting within the last two years. For reference: ASPET 2024 Program Link ASPET 2023 Program Link
- Speakers who have already been approached by the chairs and given their provisional agreement to speak should the proposal be accepted.
- Speakers from a variety of work settings (academia, industry, government, etc.).
ASPET supports providing growth opportunities to young scientists. We encourage the involvement of student/postdoc abstract-based speakers if appropriate to your session topic and format.
ASPET is strongly committed to providing opportunities to all in the pharmacology community regardless of race, color, age, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or ability/disability. Inclusion of speakers and
co-chairs from marginalized and underrepresented communities in science is greatly encouraged. The Program Committee will be assessing proposals based on the inclusion of diverse speakers and co-chairs.
Tentative or Incomplete Proposals are Discouraged
Proposals that need extensive revision after the program committee’s review may be deferred for consideration for the following year. You are encouraged to work with the division representatives in advance to refine your concepts
and proposals. Attend our Open House Q&A to informally run your ideas by program committee members and ask staff about the process. See dates/times above.
Reviewer Evaluation
Each division assigns a team of reviewers to evaluate proposals for sessions that the proposal submitter has indicated may be of interest to their division.
Career development and other topic proposals are reviewed by the Program Committee’s at-large members and other volunteers may be added for their expertise in the areas proposed.
Reviewers evaluate proposals based on:
- Do the speaker presentations support the learning objectives identified in the session description?
- Do the speaker presentations represent a balanced perspective on the topic?
- Do the proposed speakers and chairs reflect diversity in terms of career level (e.g. student, early career, mid-career, senior scientist)?
- Do the proposed speakers and chairs reflect diversity in terms of employment type (e.g. academia, government, industry)?
- Do the proposed speakers and chairs reflect diversity in terms of gender?
- Do the proposed speakers and chairs reflect diversity in terms of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color)?
- To what extent does the session format deliver the content in a way that is interactive for the audience?
- To what extent do they consider this session NOVEL OR INNOVATIVE (e.g. breaking science, innovative presentation format, new ways to look at professional development, policy, education, etc.)?
- To what extent does this session represent EXCELLENCE in science (or excellence in professional development, policy, education)
- To what extent would this session appeal to members of the division for whom they are reviewing (appeal can be scientifically or professionally such as in career development, policy topics, etc.)?
- To what extent would this session appeal to ASPET members across more than one division?